• Login
    View Item 
    •   DSpace Home
    • University Journals/ Articles
    • Gold Collection
    • View Item
    •   DSpace Home
    • University Journals/ Articles
    • Gold Collection
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    An intercomparison of remote sensing river discharge estimation algorithms from measurements of river height, width, and slope.

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    An intercomparison of remote sensing river discharge estimation algorithms from measurements of river height.pdf (207.2Kb)
    Date
    2016-05-13
    Author
    Mbiawa, Durand
    C. J., Gleason
    Garambois, pierre-andre
    Bjerklie, David M.
    Smith, Laurence C.
    Roux, Hélène
    Rodriguez, Ernesto
    Bates, P. D.
    Pavelsky, T. M.
    Monnier, Jerome
    Chen, X.
    Baldassarre, Giuliano Di
    Fiset, J.-M.
    Flipo, Nicolas
    Frasson, Renato Prata de Moraes
    J., Fulton
    Goutal, Nicole
    Hossain, F.
    Humphries, E.
    Minear, J. Toby
    Mukolwe, Micah
    Neal, Jeffrey C
    Ricci, S.
    Sanders, Brett
    Schumann, G.
    Schubert, Jochen E.
    Vilmin, Lauriane
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    The Surface Water and Ocean Topography (SWOT) satellite mission planned for launch in 2020 will map river elevations and inundated area globally for rivers >100 m wide. In advance of this launch, we here evaluated the possibility of estimating discharge in ungauged rivers using synthetic, daily "remote sensing" measurements derived from hydraulic models corrupted with minimal observational errors. Five discharge algorithms were evaluated, as well as the median of the five, for 19 rivers spanning a range of hydraulic and geomorphic conditions. Reliance upon a priori information, and thus applicability to truly ungauged reaches, varied among algorithms: one algorithm employed only global limits on velocity and depth, while the other algorithms relied on globally available prior estimates of discharge. We found at least one algorithm able to estimate instantaneous discharge to within 35% relative root-mean-squared error (RRMSE) on 14/16 nonbraided rivers despite out-of-bank flows, multichannel planforms, and backwater effects. Moreover, we found RRMSE was often dominated by bias; the median standard deviation of relative residuals across the 16 nonbraided rivers was only 12.5%. SWOT discharge algorithm progress is therefore encouraging, yet future efforts should consider incorporating ancillary data or multialgorithm synergy to improve results.
    URI
    https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR018434
    https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/2015WR018434
    http://r-library.mmust.ac.ke/123456789/1636
    Collections
    • Gold Collection [989]

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV