• Login
    View Item 
    •   DSpace Home
    • University Journals/ Articles
    • Gold Collection
    • View Item
    •   DSpace Home
    • University Journals/ Articles
    • Gold Collection
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Calibration and validation of the AquaCrop model for full and deficit irrigated cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp)

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Calibration and validation of the AquaCrop model for full and deficit irrigated cowpea.pdf (265.2Kb)
    Date
    2021-11
    Author
    Kanda, Edwin Kimutai
    Senzanje, Aidan
    Mabhaudhi, Tafadzwanashe
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    The study aimed at calibrating and validating the AquaCrop model for cowpea under full and deficit irrigation. The experiments used to calibrate and validate AquaCrop consisted of rainfed supplemented with irrigation, subsurface drip irrigation (SDI) and Moistube irrigation (MTI) with three water regimes i.e. full irrigation [100% of crop water requirement (ETc)] and deficit irrigations (DI) of 70% ETc and 40% ETc. The model was calibrated using data from the optimum and DI regimes under MTI and rainfed supplemented with irrigation experiments and validated under both optimum and DI regimes in SDI experiments. The calibration results indicated the model simulated canopy cover (CC) very well (R2 = 0.98, NRMSE = 12.2%, d-index = 0.99 and EF = 0.95) under 100% ETc and 70% ETc (R2 = 0.96, NRMSE = 15.7%, d-index = 0.98 and EF = 0.90). The simulated CC closely matched (R2 = 0.96, NRMSE = 19.6%, d-index = 0.96 and EF = 0.86) the observed under 40% ETc. During validation, the CC simulations were good for all water regimes R2 ≥ 0.94, NRMSE ≤15.4%%, EF ≥ 90 and d-index = 0.98), except under 40% ETc where model performance was poor (R2 = 0.85, NRMSE = 37.5%, d-index = 0.87 and EF = 0.45). The simulations for final biomass were good with R2 = 0.80 and NRMSE = 15.7% and R2 = 0.99 and NRMSE = 9.8% during calibration and validation, respectively. Similarly, yield simulations were good during calibration (R2 = 0.85 and NRMSE = 11.3%) and validation (R2 = 0.96 and NRMSE = 8.8%). The simulated grain yield water productivity wwa closely matched the observed values during calibration (R2 = 0.88 and NRMSE = 9.7%) and validation (R2 = 0.99 and NRMSE = 11.5%). The above results confirmed AquaCrop's suitability for simulating crop responses to water. AquaCrop can be applied to evaluate the response of cowpea to a variety of environmental conditions and management scenarios.
    URI
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pce.2020.102941
    https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1474706520303867?via%3Dihub
    http://ir-library.mmust.ac.ke:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/1791
    Collections
    • Gold Collection [969]

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV