Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSigei, E. C.
dc.contributor.authorNjue, L. A. M.
dc.contributor.authorKitolo, S. M.
dc.contributor.authorOkinyi, V. P.
dc.contributor.authorBarasa, E.
dc.contributor.authorBii, C. C.
dc.contributor.authorWere, T
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-04T14:03:42Z
dc.date.available2024-07-04T14:03:42Z
dc.date.issued2024-07-01
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ajol.info/index.php/eamj/article/view/273020
dc.identifier.urihttp://ir-library.mmust.ac.ke:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/2905
dc.description.abstractBackground: The emergence and spread of azole antifungal drug resistance including cross-resistance hinders their effective utilization in the therapy and prophylaxis of candidiasis. Methods: This study analysed the itraconazole and voriconazole anti-fungal sensitivity profiles of candida isolates from clinical specimens from candidiasis patients in Nairobi County. Antifungal susceptibility and Minimum Inhibition Concentrations (MICs) were performed using broth microdilution tests, on isolates of C. albicans (n=94) and non-albicans candida (n=46). Results: Phenotypic characterisation of antifungal resistance showed low sensitivity rates to itraconazole (21.3%) and voriconazole (24.5%) with high cross-resistance (74.5%) in the C. candida isolates. Among the non-albicans candida sensitivity for itraconazole, voriconazole, and cross-resistance were: C. glabrata (8.7%, 13.0% and 87.0%); C. parapsilosis (36.4%, 45.5% and 54.5%); C. tropicalis (40.0%, 60.0% and 40.0%); C. krusei (0.0%, 33.3% and 66.7%); C. famata (50.0%, 50.0% and 50.0%); and C. guilliemondii (0.0%, 50.0% and 50.0%), respectively. MIC analyses of the sensitive isolates showed that C. albicans had MIC50 and MIC90 mean (range) of 0.125 and 0.250 (0.031-0.500) mg/ml for itraconazole; and 0.250 and 0.250 (0.031-1.000) mg/ml for voriconazole, respectively. For non-albicans candida, the MIC50 and MIC90 mean (range) were, 0.063 and 0.125 (0.025-0.500) mg/ml for itraconazole; and 0.094 and 0.250 (0.031-1.250) mg/ml for voriconazole. Conclusion: Both C. albicans and non-albicans candida have low rates of sensitivity and concurrent high cross-resistance to itraconazole and voriconazole; with the former also exhibiting higher MICs in comparison to the later. The implications of these results include adoption of combination and/or use of different antifungal agents for candidiasis treatment and prophylaxis.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherEast African Medical Journalen_US
dc.subjectItraconazole, voriconazole, resistance, profiles, candida, isolates, Metropolitan City, public, referral, hospitalsen_US
dc.titleItraconazole and voriconazole resistance profiles in candida isolates from Nairobi Metropolitan City public referral hospitalsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record