Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://ir-library.mmust.ac.ke:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/1636
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMbiawa, Durand-
dc.contributor.authorC. J., Gleason-
dc.contributor.authorGarambois, pierre-andre-
dc.contributor.authorBjerklie, David M.-
dc.contributor.authorSmith, Laurence C.-
dc.contributor.authorRoux, Hélène-
dc.contributor.authorRodriguez, Ernesto-
dc.contributor.authorBates, P. D.-
dc.contributor.authorPavelsky, T. M.-
dc.contributor.authorMonnier, Jerome-
dc.contributor.authorChen, X.-
dc.contributor.authorBaldassarre, Giuliano Di-
dc.contributor.authorFiset, J.-M.-
dc.contributor.authorFlipo, Nicolas-
dc.contributor.authorFrasson, Renato Prata de Moraes-
dc.contributor.authorJ., Fulton-
dc.contributor.authorGoutal, Nicole-
dc.contributor.authorHossain, F.-
dc.contributor.authorHumphries, E.-
dc.contributor.authorMinear, J. Toby-
dc.contributor.authorMukolwe, Micah-
dc.contributor.authorNeal, Jeffrey C-
dc.contributor.authorRicci, S.-
dc.contributor.authorSanders, Brett-
dc.contributor.authorSchumann, G.-
dc.contributor.authorSchubert, Jochen E.-
dc.contributor.authorVilmin, Lauriane-
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-08T12:09:53Z-
dc.date.available2021-06-08T12:09:53Z-
dc.date.issued2016-05-13-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR018434-
dc.identifier.urihttps://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/2015WR018434-
dc.identifier.urihttp://r-library.mmust.ac.ke/123456789/1636-
dc.description.abstractThe Surface Water and Ocean Topography (SWOT) satellite mission planned for launch in 2020 will map river elevations and inundated area globally for rivers >100 m wide. In advance of this launch, we here evaluated the possibility of estimating discharge in ungauged rivers using synthetic, daily "remote sensing" measurements derived from hydraulic models corrupted with minimal observational errors. Five discharge algorithms were evaluated, as well as the median of the five, for 19 rivers spanning a range of hydraulic and geomorphic conditions. Reliance upon a priori information, and thus applicability to truly ungauged reaches, varied among algorithms: one algorithm employed only global limits on velocity and depth, while the other algorithms relied on globally available prior estimates of discharge. We found at least one algorithm able to estimate instantaneous discharge to within 35% relative root-mean-squared error (RRMSE) on 14/16 nonbraided rivers despite out-of-bank flows, multichannel planforms, and backwater effects. Moreover, we found RRMSE was often dominated by bias; the median standard deviation of relative residuals across the 16 nonbraided rivers was only 12.5%. SWOT discharge algorithm progress is therefore encouraging, yet future efforts should consider incorporating ancillary data or multialgorithm synergy to improve results.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherWater Resources Researchen_US
dc.subjectIntercomparison, remote, sensing, river ,discharge, estimation,algorithms, measurements, river, height, width, slope.en_US
dc.titleAn intercomparison of remote sensing river discharge estimation algorithms from measurements of river height, width, and slope.en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Gold Collection



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.