Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMiima, Douglas Atamba
dc.contributor.authorMugalavai, Edward Musungu
dc.contributor.authorWakhungu, Jacob W.
dc.date.accessioned2023-11-16T08:01:47Z
dc.date.available2023-11-16T08:01:47Z
dc.date.issued2023-11-15
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.51867/ajernet.4.2.109
dc.identifier.urihttps://ajernet.net/ojs/index.php/ajernet/article/view/139
dc.identifier.urihttp://ir-library.mmust.ac.ke:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/2399
dc.description.abstractAquaculture has become a household source of proteins, taking over the traditional red meat delicacy that promotes food security and livelihood for over 2.5 billion people. This covers approximately 40 percent of the world’s fish production. As the population increases, the demand for fish increases owing to the current deficit. Therefore, the need for freshwater aquaculture is high to meet global demand. Busia County has benefited from internal and external support for household aquaculture practices to address nutrition challenges and livelihoods as well. This study investigated freshwater aquaculture performance in Busia County, Kenya. The study adopted a descriptive cross-sectional research design, applying both quantitative and qualitative methods. The target population was 55,608 households in Bunyala and Teso South sub-counties, resulting in a sample size of 384 households. Simple random sampling was used to select the households, while purposive sampling was used to select key informants. Questionnaires, interview schedules, focus group discussion guides, and photography were used to collect data. Quantitative data were analyzed using SPSS version 25.0, while qualitative data was analyzed by grouping them into themes and reporting verbatim. Private hatcheries produced the majority of fingerlings, which increased their price for households. Households bought fish feed from the local agrovets, which was not quite affordable to farmers. Extension services were primarily provided in pond management (96.1%; OR = 2.67), record-keeping (92.7%), and fish marketing (77.7%). Private sector hatcheries are the main distributors of fingerlings to farmers, which could have contributed to the higher price of a fingerling while also considering the transportation cost of the precious fingerlings. Pond management, recording keeping, and marketing were the main extension services accorded to households surveyed. Owing to the low investment in hatcheries by the national and county governments of Busia, there is a need to rethink the installation of government hatcheries in all sub-counties for ease of accessibility and affordability in order to promote the sustainability of aquaculture.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherAFRICAN JOURNAL OF EMPIRICAL RESEARCHen_US
dc.subjectFreshwater, Aquaculture, Household, Performance, County,en_US
dc.titleFreshwater Aquaculture and Household Performance in Busia County, Kenyaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record