• Login
    View Item 
    •   MMUST Institutional Repository
    • University Journals/ Articles
    • Gold Collection
    • View Item
    •   MMUST Institutional Repository
    • University Journals/ Articles
    • Gold Collection
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Itraconazole and voriconazole resistance profiles in candida isolates from Nairobi Metropolitan City public referral hospitals

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Itraconazole and voriconazole resistance profiles in candida isolates from Nairobi Metropolitan City public referral hospitals.pdf (462.9Kb)
    Date
    2024-07-01
    Author
    Sigei, E. C.
    Njue, L. A. M.
    Kitolo, S. M.
    Okinyi, V. P.
    Barasa, E.
    Bii, C. C.
    Were, T
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Background: The emergence and spread of azole antifungal drug resistance including cross-resistance hinders their effective utilization in the therapy and prophylaxis of candidiasis. Methods: This study analysed the itraconazole and voriconazole anti-fungal sensitivity profiles of candida isolates from clinical specimens from candidiasis patients in Nairobi County. Antifungal susceptibility and Minimum Inhibition Concentrations (MICs) were performed using broth microdilution tests, on isolates of C. albicans (n=94) and non-albicans candida (n=46). Results: Phenotypic characterisation of antifungal resistance showed low sensitivity rates to itraconazole (21.3%) and voriconazole (24.5%) with high cross-resistance (74.5%) in the C. candida isolates. Among the non-albicans candida sensitivity for itraconazole, voriconazole, and cross-resistance were: C. glabrata (8.7%, 13.0% and 87.0%); C. parapsilosis (36.4%, 45.5% and 54.5%); C. tropicalis (40.0%, 60.0% and 40.0%); C. krusei (0.0%, 33.3% and 66.7%); C. famata (50.0%, 50.0% and 50.0%); and C. guilliemondii (0.0%, 50.0% and 50.0%), respectively. MIC analyses of the sensitive isolates showed that C. albicans had MIC50 and MIC90 mean (range) of 0.125 and 0.250 (0.031-0.500) mg/ml for itraconazole; and 0.250 and 0.250 (0.031-1.000) mg/ml for voriconazole, respectively. For non-albicans candida, the MIC50 and MIC90 mean (range) were, 0.063 and 0.125 (0.025-0.500) mg/ml for itraconazole; and 0.094 and 0.250 (0.031-1.250) mg/ml for voriconazole. Conclusion: Both C. albicans and non-albicans candida have low rates of sensitivity and concurrent high cross-resistance to itraconazole and voriconazole; with the former also exhibiting higher MICs in comparison to the later. The implications of these results include adoption of combination and/or use of different antifungal agents for candidiasis treatment and prophylaxis.
    URI
    https://www.ajol.info/index.php/eamj/article/view/273020
    http://ir-library.mmust.ac.ke:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/2905
    Collections
    • Gold Collection [990]

    MMUST Library copyright © 2011-2022  MMUST Open Access Policy
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
     

     

    Browse

    All of Institutional RepositoryCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    MMUST Library copyright © 2011-2022  MMUST Open Access Policy
    Contact Us | Send Feedback