Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDoris, Tuitoek
dc.contributor.authorTuitoek, Doris
dc.contributor.authorPeter, Odera
dc.contributor.authorPsusma, Tecla Sum
dc.contributor.authorMengich, Gladys
dc.date.accessioned2025-07-22T06:07:33Z
dc.date.available2025-07-22T06:07:33Z
dc.date.issued2025-07-04
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.51867/ajernet.6.3.4
dc.identifier.urihttps://ajernet.net/ojs/index.php/ajernet/article/view/1120
dc.identifier.urihttp://ir-library.mmust.ac.ke:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/3226
dc.description.abstractIntimate partner violence (IPV) is a form of abusive behaviour that can occur in marriage, cohabitation, or any other type of partnership and includes physical, sexual, or psychological abuse. Numerous studies have established the detrimental effects of intimate partner violence on mental health. There is growing evidence that social support may help alleviate these negative effects; thus, this study examined the BeST (Belongingness, Evaluation/Appraisal, Self-esteem, and Tangible) support model derived from the social support theory in alleviating the effects of mental health. This study aimed at evaluating the effectiveness of the BëST support model and factors that influence its effectiveness among victims of intimate partner violence in universities in Western Kenya. This study adopted a quasi-experimental design that recruited university students from the four public institutions in Western Kenya who had experienced any form of IPV since admission to the university. The study enrolled 426 participants: 210 in the treatment group and 216 in the control group. Two universities with the highest prevalence rates were recruited into the intervention group, while those with lower prevalence rates were recruited into the control group. The participants were recruited through snowball sampling, and data was collected at baseline and one and three months post-intervention using a self-administered questionnaire that had screening tools for anxiety, depression, and post-traumatic stress disorders (PTSD). The control group went through unstructured group counselling, while the treatment group underwent the BëST model twice weekly for a period of four weeks; in addition, a counsellor was present during the study period. Data was analysed by use of Statistical Analysis Software, where an Analysis of Variance was used to assess mental health outcomes at baseline, one- and three-months post-intervention, and multiple regression was done to identify factors that affect the model’s effectiveness in improving mental health outcomes. There was a significant decrease in mean scores in all the mental health outcomes from baseline to 3 months post-intervention. The average scores for depression went down from 9.90 to 3.41, anxiety from 7.84 to 2.68, and PTSD from 1.6 to 1.1 in the treatment group, with both the treatment and control groups showing a significant change over time in anxiety and depression (p<0.0001), but not in PTSD. There was a lower likelihood of depression among those who never used illegal drugs, while PTSD was low among participants who never consumed alcohol. This study found that the BëST support model was effective in alleviating anxiety and depression; however, it was not effective in alleviating PTSD. In addition, the use of illegal substances and alcohol affected the model's effectiveness. Recommendations: This study recommends adoption of the model and identification of complementary interventions for IPV victims with PTSD.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherAfrican Journal of Empirical Researchen_US
dc.subjectEffectiveness, BëST social, support model, mental health, outcomes, university students,quasi-experimental designen_US
dc.titleEffectiveness of BëST social support model on mental health outcomes among university students in western Kenya: A quasi-experimental designen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record